Free Fire Zone ~ January 09

Written by Christianity and the Confusion on January 1st, 2009

   This is the Free Fire Zone message board for January. The previous ones can be found by using the search engine located below the Google/dictionary box, by doing a search of “Free Fire Zone” you will be able to see all previous ones.  Feel free to reply to any post there or restart the thread here.

 


    This message board is for posting what ever you like. If you notice that some pages are missing try looking at the new page called Archives. Some may find this page useful when their regular boards are not working. Here all are welcome, after registering you will be able to post. To start a new thread click on the Post a comment you can gave that thread a title by replacing the Free Fire Zone with your title. I hope you all enjoy this page.


 

17 Comments so far ↓

  1. Anonymous says:

    It started as a hoax way back when, that the government was going to pass a bill that would tax e-mail as a means to recover lost revenue from postage. However, the flip side of the hoax was a very real dialog that was started but completely ignored. Namely, yes, but all means, let’s tax every e-mail. Not for the revenue aspect but for the one thing we all can agree that we hate: spam. One of the primary reasons spam is prolific, is because it doesn’t cost anything to send it. Even a tax of one tenth of a cent, would make most spam methodologies invalid. So what do you think?

  2. Anonymous says:

    How about we end the war and stop giving tax cuts to the richest people and see how that goes before taxing e-mail. Seriously, this is fodder for the right wing dillwads.

     

  3. Anonymous says:

    That's a ridiculous idea. What's next? Taxing television viewers for receiving commercials over the airwaves? Paying an extra fee for receiving advertisements in the mai? It's absolutely absurd.

  4. Anonymous says:

    What do we do if it turns out he is not a citizen? The real question is, why will he not provide a birth certificate and quite the nay sayers? Is it possible, that it is true and a fraud has been committed against the American People.
    Some people on this board do not believe it, but the mounting evidence is convincing that something is wrong.
    LINK TO THE ADVERTISEMENT
    http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/UPDATE/misc2008/ChicagoTribune-ObamaLtr-Nov-2008.pdf
    LINK TO ARTICLE
    http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2008/12/01/obama-birth-certificate-rears-its-ugly-head-again/?icid=200100397x1213703624x1200942024
    And why are none of the major network covering this? This is up for discussion at the supreme court Dec 4th.

  5. Anonymous says:

    If by some chance it was fully proven that he was not born in the US then I would think you could skip the proper methods and just remove him from office at once. At which point Biden would be moved into the position of president and of course Nancy Pelosi would be vice president.

    Of course you realize that to do such a thing would be monumental and would have to be proven without a shadow of a doubt. I also believe that if such a situation were to occur that there would still be large amounts of people trying to keep him in office. All in all it would be a massive hurtle.

  6. Anonymous says:

    This is the biggest conspiracy theory that I have ever heard. Republicans couldn't win so they are trying to do make Barack's presidency look illegitimate. These are the same people who couldn't win without cheating, for the last 8 years there hasn't been a legitimate president.
    If there was any truth to this conspiracy theory it would of come out during the election. There is nothing to it, nothing! For it to be true it would have taken the help of the Republican governor and Barack's grandparents would have had to have the foresight years ago to get a doctored birth certificate. All this sounds like just another right-wing tinfoil hat conspiracy theory.

  7. Anonymous says:

       There are those who would claim that Non-believers are attacking Jesus, what they miss is that their own actions are the greatest assault upon Christ. They ignore what Jesus was really about and try to reinvent Him to be a vicious warrior. Describing His ministry, Jesus said this:

    THE SPIRIT OF THE LORD IS UPON ME,
    BECAUSE HE ANOINTED ME TO PREACH THE GOSPEL TO THE POOR.
    HE HAS SENT ME TO PROCLAIM RELEASE TO THE CAPTIVES,
    AND RECOVERY OF SIGHT TO THE BLIND,
    TO SET FREE THOSE WHO ARE OPPRESSED,
    TO PROCLAIM THE FAVORABLE YEAR OF THE LORD.

       He came to help the needy and never would condone the attitude of “I have mine, so the devil with the rest of the world!” As a matter of fact He told His followers that those who did not help the least of His brothers (all mankind) would be cast into the fires of hell.

       It is unbelievable that those who oppose the government aiding the poor have no problem with it murdering millions of innocent Iraqis. They have the audacity to claim that those who oppose their misrepresentation of Christ as attacking Him, when it is they who are attacking God with their misrepresentation. What is really a shame is that some people think that they are what true Christianity is all about.

    Lk 4: 18 & 19
    Mt 25

  8. Anonymous says:

       Within Christianity there is much confusion as to the so-called Creation story and God's plan for the lives of each individual. The sad truth is that in focusing on the story of Creation most miss the real message that Moses was trying to convey. Remember that the Israelites had just been delivered from some 400 years of slavery. The question which must have been most on their lips had to be, “How could God allow this?” “Was it God's plan for us to be slaves?” The story of Eden is one of a paradise where no one died, where there was no sickness, and murder and war were unimaginable. There was no rich, no poor and no children went to bed hungry. God's plan for mankind was to live in such a peaceful paradise, but man chose otherwise.

       The temptation that man gave in to was not the eating of a forbidden fruit or that of disobedience; rather it was the temptation to become gods themselves. Moses understood this all too well having grown up in the house of Pharaoh, who was considered a living god. Moses saw that the evil which plagued man was rooted in this desire for godhood. When people seek to dominate other people they do so to feed this godhood desire. It is also true when someone refuses to yield to any authority other than himself; he too is feeding that godhood desire. From this all sorts of evils have befallen mankind.

       It was not God's plan that we should be this way, but He wanted us to have Freewill. He could have made us so that we have no choice but to follow Him, which was not what He wanted. Once we chose to go our own way, our lives no longer fit into His plan. God sought to rectify this by becoming man and reuniting us to God. Many people confuse God's plan for individuals as that of fatalism, that is to say that all that happens is because that is how God planned it. God's plan is for all mankind to be reunited to Him in love and enjoy the peaceful existence that He first designed. I know this may not answer all questions, but I hope that this might give a little more light.

  9. Anonymous says:

    My liberal cousin sent me this buck email, please tell me how someone can think this way.

    For the past decade, all our government wants to do is cut taxes. CUT TAXES! CUT TAXES!! CUT TAXES!!!
    You know, maybe I was just born in the wrong generation, the generation too young to remember the great hero Ronald Reagan [sarcasm]. It's like generations before me have all been brainwashed by the great Reagan into thinking tax cuts are the solution to everything. Did anyone in that generation ever look and see a deficit chart from Reagan's years?
    It was so magically successful that the great George W Bush decided to do the exact same thing. Wow, and the deficit went up again? You don't say. And it did next to nothing for average Americans too huh? I'm shocked
    George W Bush's tax cut was so magically successful that the democrats and republican's passed some economic stimulus package's. They were going to throw money at you and let you save the economy.
    Wow, I wonder what happened then. The deficit went up, and nothing improved AGAIN.
    And here we are, at the beginning of a massive recession, after many years of nothing but tax cuts – and what does our government want to do?
    You guessed it, more tax cuts!!!
    Am I missing something here? What is the definition of insanity?

  10. Anonymous says:

    But what if it is true?

  11. Anonymous says:
    Conservatives have told us for years that the media is liberal and now they are telling us that the Fairness Doctrine will force equal time on the media. That would mean more Conservative control of the media if it really is a liberal media. What doesn't make sense is that Conservatives are scared to death of anything close to a Fairness Doctrine, but if it made the media less liberal and more conservative why are Conservatives fighting it?
  12. Anonymous says:

    What is a myth is what the Republicans have been saying for years, the media isn't liberal and the right has been distorting what the Fairness Doctrine was and what the Democratic Congress is going to do. The lie that the rights has been pedaling is that with the new FD any station that had three hours of Republican talk would have to follow with a three hour of Democratic talk. The FD never was that way and that is not what Congress will do. However, if the media was liberal and the lie about the FD true, that should make conservative jump for joy, but they know both things are lies. All that the new FD will do is end the monopolies held by the right. It will end one company owning everything and this will allow more local ownership and smaller companies to compete. What it will not do is dictate the programming, which will be up to the ownership just like it is now. If a show is a money maker, it would be picked over a money loser and since the right claims that they are in the first camp they shouldn't be afraid, unless they know that is a lie too.

  13. Anonymous says:

    GUANTANAMO BAY, Cuba, Jan. 20 — In one of its first actions, the Obama administration instructed military prosecutors late Tuesday to seek a 120-day suspension of legal proceedings involving detainees at the naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba — a clear break with the approach of the outgoing Bush administration. Read more

    This is the first of many mistakes that Obama is going to make. I don't see how he can set these terrorists free, doesn't he that they will attack Americans? Like it or not, President Bush kept us safe with things like Gitmo. If the terrorist see Obama as soft they will attack.

  14. Anonymous says:

    Let the Games begin.. bet the states he wants to send them to rejects them..
    let's petition they send all the ones they want free to democratic states..after all.. they are the ones that want to free them..

  15. Anonymous says:

    Who said anything about setting them free? Most of them have been there for 6 years without a trial, if the government had anything on them they would of been found guilty by now I would think. Even if they are guilty, there is no way they could escape from a maximum security prison.

  16. Anonymous says:

    I love it, you left them with a no win argument. They can't argue that the media is liberal while saying that there shouldn't be more fairness.

  17. Anonymous says:

    Who here wants to see the economy go so bad that we have another great depression? Who thinks that attitude is unpatriotic?

Leave a Comment